Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New BA.1 lineage missing Spike N440K, Spike K417N mutations #368

Closed
nirvtul opened this issue Dec 12, 2021 · 4 comments
Closed

New BA.1 lineage missing Spike N440K, Spike K417N mutations #368

nirvtul opened this issue Dec 12, 2021 · 4 comments

Comments

@nirvtul
Copy link

nirvtul commented Dec 12, 2021

Earliest sequences: EPI_ISL_6795189 (2021-11-12), EPI_ISL_6795188.2 (2021-11-12) - detected in South Africa

Predominantly circulating in USA (Texas), England, Scotland, South Africa.

Defining mutations: -Spike_N440K, -Spike_K417N, Spike_H69del,Spike_V70del,NSP5_P132H,N_R203K,Spike_G142D,NSP3_A1892T,N_P13L,NSP3_L1266I,N_R32del,NSP4_T492I,NSP6_L105del,Spike_L212I,Spike_Y505H,NSP6_G107del,NSP6_I189V,N_G204R,Spike_V143del,NSP6_S106del,NSP3_S1265del, NSP14_I42V, Spike_Y144del,Spike_ins214EPE, N_S33del, Spike_S375F, N_E31del, NSP3_K38R, Spike_N211del, Spike_L981F,NSP12_P323L,Spike_Y145del

Supporting entries in GISAID: 785 (As of Dec 12/2021)
Supporting entries in GISAID without ambiguous bases: EPI_ISL_7415721,EPI_ISL_7415830,EPI_ISL_7415731,EPI_ISL_7415770,EPI_ISL_7415887,EPI_ISL_7415723,EPI_ISL_7415774,EPI_ISL_7415887

Phylogenetic Analysis conducted through NJ using sequences containing unambiguous bases shows this potentially new lineage forming a clade separately from other BA.1 sequences.

New_BA_1_Dec12def

Attaching file containing supporting entries in GISAID: 785 (As of Dec 12/2021)
New_BA_1_Dec12_def.txt

Proposed lineage name: BA.3 (?)

Hope this is of help.
Nirvana

@arminlahm
Copy link

Hi, in your file New_BA_1_Dec12_def.txt you have listed EPI_ISL_6699730. This spike protein sequence, as present in GISAIDs spikeprot1209.fasta file does, yes, not contain Spike N440K and Spike K417N mutations but this is because that segment (410 to 459) of the sequence is simply XXXXXXXXX (alignment in BA1.align.txt) ! Did you check if the other sequences have this segment covered by sequence ?
Best,
Armin
BA1.align.txt

@corneliusroemer
Copy link
Contributor

Closed with same arguments as for #364

This issue does not seem to contain any new evidence.

#364 (comment)

@nirvtul
Copy link
Author

nirvtul commented Dec 12, 2021

Hello,
I have based my finding principally on the following entries that do not contain ambiguous sites.

Supporting entries in GISAID without ambiguous bases: EPI_ISL_7415721,EPI_ISL_7415830,EPI_ISL_7415731,EPI_ISL_7415770,EPI_ISL_7415887,EPI_ISL_7415723,EPI_ISL_7415774,EPI_ISL_7415887
So, I wonder if you would find that gap in the entries I have listed above too. By the way, I haven't attached any file named "spikeprot1209.fasta".
Bests,
Nirvana

@corneliusroemer
Copy link
Contributor

I never mentioned ambiguous sites.

Backfilled nucleotides are usually not ambiguous.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants