You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 2, 2021. It is now read-only.
My personal id is: https://github.com/vinay13091993
I have a suggestion.
Currently SCALE UNIFORMLY checkbox is set to true by default. Please make it false just for the sake of better user experience.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
different scales will give the wrong idea to users.
All of these charts represent different numbers, what we currently have gives a wrong idea, not the other way around.
If the numbers mean different things, they should be presented differently. Hence not keeping it uniform provides a better experience.
Edit: Also, since all of these numbers are rising in an exponential manner, only the first graph gives this impression while the other ones look non-exponential. This because we are comparing apples and oranges in the same scale.
I agree with @thanoskaka, but for different reasons. If we wanted uniform scaling, we could have plotted everything on the same graph. Separating them into different graphs, but keeping the scales uniform by default seems like a perfunctory approach.
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
My personal id is: https://github.com/vinay13091993
I have a suggestion.
Currently SCALE UNIFORMLY checkbox is set to true by default. Please make it false just for the sake of better user experience.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: