Skip to content

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We鈥檒l occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Integration with AutoGen #20

Closed
cpacker opened this issue Oct 17, 2023 · 6 comments
Closed

Integration with AutoGen #20

cpacker opened this issue Oct 17, 2023 · 6 comments
Labels
roadmap Planned features

Comments

@cpacker
Copy link
Owner

cpacker commented Oct 17, 2023

No description provided.

@cpacker cpacker added the roadmap Planned features label Oct 17, 2023
@tomsib2001
Copy link

Note that the folks at AutoGen are also referencing this project: microsoft/autogen#156 (comment)

@mberman84
Copy link

This would be incredible!

@console-1
Copy link

This would truly be a game changer and in turn possibly creating actual super agents. Any idea how far along the roadmap this might be @cpacker ? Not rushing at all, just excited to see how you and the squad go about it. I have been trawling the web high and low to find a solution to integrate MemGPT into AutoGen but have come up emptier than my wallet around the 5th of each month. Regardless of when I still wanted to thank you and the contributors for creating an amazing project. Not all heroes wear capes.

@QZGao
Copy link
Contributor

QZGao commented Oct 20, 2023

I'm trying on my own to restructure the AgentAsync following the AutoGen's approach on multi-agents, but there is a place where I couldn't figure out why it is written that way:

Line 78 of main.py

Isn't user_input = None? Why does it become a file name? Is it safe to remove user_input in main() (if I somehow make user_input into a class field of UserAgent and replace the while loop with something else)?

@cpacker
Copy link
Owner Author

cpacker commented Oct 20, 2023

@QZGao 馃悶 caught thanks for that

@briancunning
Copy link

This would be amazing. It was the first thing I thought of when I saw this repo.

Repository owner locked and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 21, 2023
@cpacker cpacker converted this issue into discussion #65 Oct 21, 2023

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

Labels
roadmap Planned features
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants