New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
P2855 R1 Member customization points for Senders and Receivers #1518
Comments
2023-06-12 Library Evolution VarnaP2855R0: Member customization points for Senders and Receivers 2023-06-12 Library Evolution Minutes Chair: Fabio Fracassi, Nevin Liber Champion: Ville Voutilainen Minute Taker: Nat Goodspeed SummaryPOLL: We want to spend more time on the direction of P2855 (knowing that our time is limited) and investigate where we can use member functions for S/R customization points.
Attendance: 31 (P) + 4 (R) # of Authors: 1 Author's Position: (wasn't recorded) Outcome: Strong consensus in favor. Senders/Receivers in its current form uses a powerful/flexible yet syntactically heavy library mechanism for function customization (tag_invoke). OutcomeWe approve of the general direction of the paper, but need further work on the details e.g.
|
2023-11-06 Library Evolution KonaP2855R0: Member customization points for Senders and Receivers 2023-11-06 Library Evolution Minutes Was seen as a reference to the work done to reduce "tag_invoke". No progress was made on the paper. |
2024-03-21 Library Evolution TokyoP2855R1: Member customization points for Senders and Receivers 2024-03-21 Library Evolution Tokyo Minutes Champion: Ville Voutillainen SummaryPOLL: Send P2855R1 (Member customization points for Senders and Receivers) to LWG for C++26 classified as B1, to be merged into P2300, to be confirmed with a Library Evolution electronic poll.
Attendance: 16+5 # of Authors: 1 Author Position: SF Outcome: Strong Consensus Comments: POLL: Remove receiver_adaptor ([exec.utils.rcvr.adptr]) and related tag invoke overloads ([exec.utils.rcvr.adptr.nonmembers]) from P2300, pending electronic polling results.
Attendance: 16+5 # of Authors: ??? Author Position: Outcome: Strong Consensus Comments: Next StepsElectronic polling and merging with P2300. |
P2855R0 Member customization points for Senders and Receivers (Ville Voutilainen)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: