P2066 Suggested draft TS for C++ Extensions for Transaction Memory Light #793
Comments
Let's have SG1 take a look first, then forward to EWG. |
We will see this again in Varna |
P2066R1 Suggested draft TS for C++ Extensions for Transaction Memory Light (Jens Maurer, Hans Boehm, Victor Luchangco, Michael L. Scott, Michael Spear, and Michael Wong) |
P2066R2 Suggested draft TS for C++ Extensions for Transaction Memory Light (Jens Maurer, Hans Boehm, Victor Luchangco, Michael L. Scott, Michael Spear, and Michael Wong) |
SG1 approves the design and wording of P2066R2 targeting the next |
This contains no library changes, but only core language changes, and thus should go to EWG next. |
This was discussed in EWG telecon today. Use a/many (potentially contextual) keyword to denote atomic blocks, rather than making it a library feature. For example
The proposed approach to TM generally seems acceptable, and would fit in a TM TS v2.
We'll see it again after discussing the particular keyword approach. LEWG should also see it to discuss library support guarantees, if any. |
P2066R3 Suggested draft TS for C++ Extensions for Transaction Memory Light (Jens Maurer, Hans Boehm, Victor Luchangco, Michael L. Scott, Michael Spear, and Michael Wong) |
P2066R4 Suggested draft TS for C++ Extensions for Minimal Transactional Memory (Jens Maurer, Hans Boehm, Victor Luchangco, Michael L. Scott, Michael Spear, and Michael Wong) |
P2066R0 Suggested draft TS for C++ Extensions for Transaction Memory Light (Jens Maurer, Michael L. Scott)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: