Direct Addressing Mode does not seem to work

[icemanind]

Describe the bug
When using direct addressing mode, no bytes seem to be created. I am using ADCA as an example, but the issue seems to affect all direct addressing mode mnemonics.

To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:

1. Create a file and call it test.asm:

        ORG    $1000
        ADCA    <$9F

2. Compile using: python assembler.py --print test.asm

Expected behavior
With the print parameter in place, it should produce this output:

-- Assembled Statements --
$1000                         ORG $1000                          ;                                         
$1000      999F               ADCA <$9F     

Actual behavior
I am getting no byte codes at all:

-- Assembled Statements --
$1000                         ORG $1000                          ;                                         
$1000                         ADCA <$9F     

[craigthomas]

@icemanind looks like both explicit direct and extended addressing are not being parsed correctly. So similarly:

        ORG $1000
START   LDA >$FEEE
        END START

The problem is that extended and direct addressing are deferred until later on in the assembly process, but no check is there to see if the program listing explicitly uses < or >. I'll implement a fix for that and add some regression tests as well. Thanks for finding that and reporting it!

[icemanind]

No problem! This is a fantastic project you started and it works great. Please keep up the great work! Along the same lines, looking at the code, I don't think the SETDP pseudo mnemonic is actually doing anything (other than being recognized as a pseudo-op by the parser). I haven't actually tried it though, so I could be wrong. Again, thanks for the great work on this!

[craigthomas]

@icemanind Thanks for the kind words! I really appreciate it! A new pull request should go through momentarily with a fix for the direct and extended addressing modes. You are indeed correct about the SETDP pseudo op. It's a recognized mnemonic, but it still needs to be implemented in the assembler. Thanks again!