Do we need Enum::Case type?

[iluuu1994]

$a instanceof Suit::Spades; // true

I'm not entirely sure we really need support for the type Enum::Case at this point because it's equivalent to ===. It's only potentially useful when you want to call methods in some other context without checking/asserting the case first.

[Crell]

Possibly not. I listed that mainly because I expected it would fall out anyway, and to demonstrate that it's a subclass. Does it not "just work"?

[iluuu1994]

Not completely automatic but probably easy. I feel like this part could be a tiny bit controversial. We can also leave it in and I'll see how easy it is to implement.

[iluuu1994]

This is irrelevant now.