Support for Secrets Manager

[RealHarshThakur]

What problem are you facing?

Similar to crossplane-contrib/provider-aws#405 for GCP

How could Crossplane help solve your problem?

By supporting Secrets Manager

I would like to take this issue up. Please assign it to me.cc : @jbw976 @hasheddan

[mmosttler]

are there any updates on this? We have a need to be able to create a cloud secret manager secret declaratively where we can enforce some standards and set permissions. For our case we expect the secret value to be provided in a different way (not in this manifest).

[dsiguero]

Wasn't crossplane meant to have 100% coverage for cloud resources? https://blog.upbound.io/cloud-service-coverage/

[Feggah]

@dsiguero We have achieved 100% coverage with the new Terrajet providers, as highlighted in the blog post that you mentioned:

Crossplane now has 100% coverage for major cloud services with the new providers: provider-jet-aws, provider-jet-azure, and provider-jet-gcp. To create new providers like these, we are introducing Terrajet, a code generation pipeline for creating Crossplane providers.

Note that provider-jet-gcp is another provider, this is the provider-gcp. We are currently trying to simplify this for our users by merging them (crossplane/crossplane#2930), but currently we have two separate ones:

• Classic providers (written by hand, that's the case of this provider);
• Generated by Terrajet (this is the provider-jet-gcp);