Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
291 lines (221 loc) · 11.3 KB

one-pager-cross-resource-referencing.md

File metadata and controls

291 lines (221 loc) · 11.3 KB
Raw

Cross Resource Referencing

  • Owner: Javad Taheri (@soorena776)
  • Reviewers: Crossplane Maintainers
  • Status: Accepted

Background

Crossplane provisions and monitors external resources in third party cloud providers, following the declared spec in the corresponding managed resource objects. With the rise of gitops style provisioning, in a lot of scenarios where multiple interconnected resources need to be provisioned, resource r2 might consume some attribute of resource r1. This article discusses such cross resource references and proposes solutions to address the challenges in Crossplane.

Definitions

  • Managed Resource Solution

    In a lot of scenarios a single resource is not operational or very useful on its own. In order to achieve a desired functionality, usually a group of resources need to be provisioned and configured to communicate with each other. For example in order to have an EKS cluster set up in AWS, in addition to an EKS instance we also need to provision and configure the required network resources like VPC and Subnet, and an RDS security group for database access. In this article we call such set of resources which together form a desired functionality or configuration, a Managed Resource Solution, or just a Solution for brevity.

  • Blocking and Non-Blocking Dependencies

    Imagine two resources r1 and r2 in a solution. We define r2 has a blocking dependency on r1, if provisioning r2 requires any attributes of r1. For instance, a Subnet has a blocking dependency on a VPC, since VPC.Id is required for provisioning the Subnet.

    In addition we define r2 has a non-blocking dependency on r1, if r2 doesn't require any attributes of r1 to be provisioned but the functionality desired by the solution requires existence of both r2 and r1. For example, an EKS cluster needs to have the right IAMRolePolicyAttachment resource in order to have to required permissions when accessing resources, even though it does not need any attributes of IAMRolePolicyAttachment to be provisioned.

  • Non-deterministic Resource Attribute

    We define the attribute foo of resource r non-deterministic, if foo's value only becomes known after r is provisioned. For example vpcID is a non-deterministic attribute of a VPC resource.

  • Composite Resource Attribute

    We define the attribute foo of resource r composite, if foo's value is deterministic and composed of the attributes of other resources. As an example, network attribute of Subnetwork type in GCP, is formed as

    /projects/[gcp-project]/global/networks/[network-name]

    where [gcp-project] and [network-name] are attributes of other resources.

Objectives

Goals

  • Support gitops style declarative resource provisioning. Apply a directory of YAML resources, which will eventually become a series of online and functioning managed resources. This requires:

    • Support to reference attributes of other resources in a resource YAML object
    • Support for cross resource blocking dependency

  • Support using existing external resources to be referenced by the YAML objects

Non Goals

  • Support non-blocking dependencies between resources

Proposal

Let's consider the following sample solution where a VPC, and a Subnet needs to be provisioned. The YAML object will look like following:

---
apiVersion: network.aws.crossplane.io/v1alpha2
kind: VPC
metadata:
  namespace: cool-ns
  name: my-vpc
spec:
  ...
---
apiVersion: network.aws.crossplane.io/v1alpha2
kind: Subnet
metadata:
  namespace: cool-ns
  name: my-subnet
spec:
  # this is the vpcId of the external vpc, represented by my-vpc
  vpcId: [my-vpc_vpcId]
  ...

Cross referencing using Attribute Referencers

In this example since vpcId is non-deterministic we will need a mechanism to indicate this cross reference in the YAML object. We propose the notion of Attribute Referencer, as a go interface as following:

type AttributeReferencer interface {

	// GetStatus looks up the referenced objects in K8S api and returns a list
	// of ReferenceStatus
	GetStatus(context.Context, CanReference, client.Reader) ([]ReferenceStatus, error)

	// Build retrieves referenced resource, as well as other non-managed
	// resources (like a `Provider`), and builds the referenced attribute
	Build(context.Context, CanReference, client.Reader) (string, error)

	// Assign accepts a managed resource object, and assigns the given value to the
	// corresponding property
	Assign(CanReference, string) error
}

Having this interface, we can implement VpcIDRefResolver as

type VpcIDRefResolver struct {
  // the object that is needed for resolving vpcID
  ObjectReference `json:"inline"`
}

And then we implement the AttributeReferencer method sets.

  • Simplifying Assumption We assume that each AttributeReferencer field only needs to refer to one resource object. If more resources are needed, those resources can be referenced using other attributes of the source, or the referenced resource. This assumption helps us have a consistent API with Kubernetes referencer fields (e.g. with a Ref suffix), where an ObjectReference field is used for referencing.

Using VpcIDRefResolver, we then can modify Subnet type as:

- // VPCID is the ID of the VPC.
- VPCID string `json:"vpcId"`
+ // VPCIDRef resolves the VPCID from the refenreced VPC
+ VPCIDRef *VpcIDRefResolver `json:"vpcIdRef" resource:"attributereferencer"`

Now we can update the Subnet YAML object in the sample solution as following:

---
apiVersion: network.aws.crossplane.io/v1alpha2
kind: Subnet
metadata:
  namespace: cool-ns
  name: my-subnet
spec:
  # reference to API objects from which the vpcId will be resolved
  vpcIdRef:
    name: my-vpc
  ...
---

Note here that we added a Ref suffix to the vpcIdRef, emphasizing that it is different than vpcId. In addition we used resource:"attributereferencer" tag, to explicitly indicate that this field implements that interface, which is used for type validation, code readability and showing the intention of the field explicitly.

This mechanism resolves the referenced non-deterministic attributes, as it waits for the specified object to become available using GetStatus method. Once the referenced resource is ready, the corresponding Build method executes and retrieves the required attributes from various objects and builds the desired attribute. Finally, the Assign method assigns the built value to the right field in the owning object.

Using the same mechanism, composite attributes could also be referenced and built. In this case, the Build method potentially would implement a more complex composition logic.

Implementation in Crossplane

To implement the above mentioned cross referencing in Crossplane, we modify the Managed Reconciler in crossplane-runtime to add logic to call ResolveReferences. ResolveReferences will check to see if any of the fields in the give API type are of interface type AttributeReferencer, and if so, attempts to resolve them. If resolution for any reason is not completed, reconciliation gets rescheduled. Once a reference field is resolved, its value will be stored in the equivalent non Ref field, and reconciler proceeds to the next steps.

Maintain High Fidelity

When provisioning resources, it is desirable to support existing external resources which are not managed by Crossplane. For instance assume that in the VPC and Subnet sample solution, the VPC resource already exists and we only want to provision the Subnet. Since we changed the VPCID to VPCIDRef in the Subnet type, it won't be possible to use the external VPCID.

To support this case, we need to keep the VPCID field in Subnet, so we update the modification as:

  // VPCID is the ID of the VPC.
- VPCID string `json:"vpcId"`
+ VPCID string `json:"vpcId,omitempty"`
+ // VPCIDRef resolves the VPCID from the refenreced VPC
+ VPCIDRef VpcIDRefResolver `json:"vpcIdRef,omitempty"`

Note that we added omitempty rule to both fields, making them optional.

If both fields are provided VPCIDRef takes priority and overwrites VPCID with the resolved value.

Project Blocking Dependency in Resource Status

To show the status of resolving references of a resource, we add the new condition type ReferencesResolved to the existing Managed resources Conditions. Resolving a referenced attribute results in one of the following outcomes, ordered with higher priority:

  1. An error occurs during resolving references. In this case ReconcileError condition is added to resources conditions, and the resource is rescheduled for reconciliation.

  2. The referenced object doesn't exist, or is not yet Ready. In this case the resource will be assigned with a ReferencesResolved condition with Status=ConditionFalse, and its Reason listing the resources that don't exist or are not ready. Also, the resolving should be re-scheduled with a long wait.

  3. The referenced object is Ready. In this case the resource will be assigned with a ReferencesResolved condition with Status=ConditionTrue.

If two or more referenced objects have different outcomes, the status of the resource should be updated to the outcome with the higher priority.

Cleaning Up a Solution

After a solution is created in Crossplane by running:

kubectl apply -f <directory of YAML>

it's also desirable to be able to delete it by running:

kubectl delete -f <directory of YAML>

When deleting the managed resources of a solution in Crossplane, it is possible that some of the corresponding external resources cannot be deleted, as other resources depend on them and the cloud provider doesn't allow such deletion. For example in the sample solution described above, AWS blocks deletion of the external resource of VPC as long as there is an external Subnet which consumes that VPC.

This problem will be solved automatically as all managed resources eventually reconcile after retrying. In the sample solution example, the Subnet external resource gets eventually deleted and hence the next attempt to delete the VPC will succeed as there will be no more depending resources. This could later be improved by leveraging Foreground cascading deletion mechanism, where dependent objects are deleted first.

Related Issues