Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove non-raising verification functions #92

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 5, 2013
Merged

Conversation

namelessjon
Copy link
Contributor

Now all three (authenticators, signatures and boxes) will raise if there
are errors in verifying them. This ensures that errors are dealt with,
or the program comes crashing to a halt. Self-tests are also updated.

Now all three (authenticators, signatures and boxes) will raise if there
are errors in verifying them.  This ensures that errors are dealt with,
or the program comes crashing to a halt.  Self-tests are also updated.
@tarcieri
Copy link
Contributor

tarcieri commented Nov 4, 2013

Some oddness with Travis running the tests. Looks like your branch is named raising_method but Travis is attempting to run tests against the nonexistent raising_methods branch... did you rename it before the tests could run?

Otherwise it looks good to me 👍

@tarcieri
Copy link
Contributor

tarcieri commented Nov 5, 2013

Tests now passed. Merging...

tarcieri added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 5, 2013
Remove non-raising verification functions
@tarcieri tarcieri merged commit 19bd229 into master Nov 5, 2013
@tarcieri tarcieri deleted the raising_method branch November 5, 2013 00:11
@tarcieri tarcieri mentioned this pull request Nov 5, 2013
1 task
@namelessjon
Copy link
Contributor Author

That was me changing branches, after a slightly careless squash merge confused things. Unfortunately, the other travis jobs were already queued.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants