BEM naming convention and extends in markup.

[Florian-R]

Not really an issue, more a question.

I totally get the point of the BEM naming convention, it's hugely useful to see how elements relate to each other.

What's unclear to me is why some objects who extends others doesn't repeat their ancestor name.

For exemple, the pagination object extends the nav object. If i remove the nav class, it breaks. Would it make sense to rename it .nav--pagination or i am missing something?

[iparr]

In my opinion, in this case, if pagination doesn't work without the nav object then it should be .nav--pagination.

After-all, pagination is a type of navigation so this seems to make a lot of sense.

[leevigraham]

@csswizardry can you provide some guidance / feedback on this?

[csswizardry]

Please see #291.

Thank you.