-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 65
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Require all competitors to sign every attempt? #63
Comments
A7c requires that the competitor signs after the solve and after the judge has verified the puzzle. I know some people just sign everything in advance, and that is bad. I'll make sure to tell them the purpose of the signing, and that if they signed, they can't really complain later if something is wrong. |
I support changing this, or at least making this more clear. Often when a competitor does the line/arrow thing, he doesn't realize that by doing so he has acknowledged in advance anything the judges write. At Worlds when I judged people who did this to their scorecards, I would say something along the lines of "Hypothetically, if I were to write 'DNF' by mistake, and you realize after the timer was reset, you wouldn't be able to do much about it since you've already signed it" then I suggested to them to cross off the arrow and sign each of their individual completed attempts. |
I don't like the term "final result," this could be easily confused with the 5th (or 3rd) solve in the average. I think that the term "result" suffices. |
I had the same concern. However, I want it to be completely ambiguous that |
I think substituting the active for the passive voice makes it seem A7c2) The competitor must not sign an attempt on the score sheet Christopher Clement On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 6:54 PM, Lucas Garron notifications@github.comwrote:
|
I sign every attempt, but sometimes competitors will sign once and draw an arrow over the entire column to avoid having to sign again. This defeats the point of an official acknowledgment, even if it technically prevents them from disputing it.
(If they're being lazy and come back with video evidence when it was recorded wrong, that's just inconsiderate.)
I'm not saying I support changing this, but I think it should be discussed.
Email to Delegate list, December 08, 2013
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: