-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 791
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Any plans for scipy.optimize? #6112
Comments
There are some discussions ongoing but no concrete plan yet. @Rolandw0w Is there a particular functionality in the cc: @cjnolet for vis |
The problem that brought me here is linear programming and its slowness for scipy implementation. |
Indeed, the current discussions have been around generalizing some of the solvers from cuml and move them to the RAFT project (https://github.com/rapidsai/raft) so they can be exposed through the |
Sounds good, thank you! |
Let's keep this issue open so that others can find the latest status 😃 |
xref: rapidsai/raft#374 |
@Rolandw0w I just want to follow up on this issue as we are now starting to make RAFT features available to cupy through |
@cjnolet If I had to choose, I'd prefer |
In addition to SLSQP, CG, BFGS and L-BFGS-B are also great options for starter. |
Tagging @teju85 for further viz. |
Any update? |
Any update on this? Would love to have a gpu version of scipy.optimize.minimize using SLSQP |
Chiming in to agree with ndjvisser - I'd love a scipy.optimize.minimize implementation. |
Don't know if possible, but I would like very much scipy.optimize.differential_evolution on cupy! |
Maybe folks asking for this could share more about their use cases? How would you use this functionality? What would it help you accomplish? |
I don't have much knowledge about the subject at all, so I may be wrong in multiple accounts. |
Description
I wonder if there are any plans/ETAs on scipy.optimize module?
Thank you!
Additional Information
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: