Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Document comparison between official and open access cycling data #16

Closed
Robinlovelace opened this issue Mar 27, 2017 · 2 comments
Closed

Document comparison between official and open access cycling data #16

Robinlovelace opened this issue Mar 27, 2017 · 2 comments
Assignees
@mem48
Milestone
WP1 Report

Comments

@Robinlovelace
Copy link
Contributor

And summarise in brief document (suggestion: this is an appendix to the final report).

Could build on an early conference paper on this topic (Lovelace 2015).

Lovelace, Robin. 2015. “Crowd Sourced vs Centralised Data for Transport Planning: A Case Study of Bicycle Path Data in the UK.” GIS Research UK(GISRUK). Leeds. Http://Leeds. Gisruk. Org/Abstracts/GISRUK2015_submission_71. Pdf.
@Robinlovelace Robinlovelace added this to the Draft final report milestone Mar 27, 2017
@Robinlovelace
Copy link
Contributor Author

To clarify: this will justify our focus on OSM data in this project - a couple of paragraphs outlining why we've used OSM data and its benefits (as well as honest limitations, e.g. variable quality over space) will be sufficient.

@Robinlovelace
Copy link
Contributor Author

Closing for now as this is mostly covered in that report and because there is little official data on cycle paths unfortunately: http://leeds.gisruk.org/abstracts/GISRUK2015_submission_71.pdf

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@mem48 mem48

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
WP1 Report
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@Robinlovelace @mem48