Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Compose page features #16

Closed
jasonmunro opened this issue Aug 14, 2015 · 5 comments
Closed

Compose page features #16

jasonmunro opened this issue Aug 14, 2015 · 5 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement suggest an improvement

Comments

@jasonmunro
Copy link
Member

The compose page is very limited right now, it needs:

  • Cc/Bcc support
  • attachments (once a system is built for that)
  • proper reply formatting
  • saving of sent message outside auto-save via Gmail
  • probably more
@jasonmunro jasonmunro added the enhancement suggest an improvement label Aug 14, 2015
@jasonmunro jasonmunro self-assigned this Aug 14, 2015
@dumblob
Copy link
Member

dumblob commented Aug 15, 2015

With proper reply formatting you meant among other things also Reply-To:?

@jasonmunro
Copy link
Member Author

I was thinking more about the fact we are not correctly setting In-reply-to on the outbound message (this should be set to the original message-id header), and that we should be flipping the IMAP Answered flag on the original. If we are not properly setting Reply-to on the outbound message, then yes, lets include that :)

@jasonmunro
Copy link
Member Author

Cc/Bcc support is done

@jasonmunro
Copy link
Member Author

in-reply-to and reply-to headers are now supported. reply-to is not settable currently, it just defaults to the From header values

@jasonmunro
Copy link
Member Author

This is complete except for saving sent messages in an imap folder. I'm going to close this and open more specific issues for anything that remains.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement suggest an improvement
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants