Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

MDN | DSN Missing in compose (?) #687

Open
resu-cireneg opened this issue Mar 8, 2023 · 7 comments · Fixed by #703
Open

MDN | DSN Missing in compose (?) #687

resu-cireneg opened this issue Mar 8, 2023 · 7 comments · Fixed by #703
Assignees
Labels
awaiting feedback please follow up!

Comments

@resu-cireneg
Copy link

🚀 Feature

2 Checkboxes ,
( as seen on tons of other mailers )

Example

https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Message_Disposition_Notification
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bounce_message

Design, Layout, Architecture

Make the PHP-Sending part set the 2 flags , implement 2 checkboxes

@marclaporte
Copy link
Member

I agree. Let's do it.

@jasonmunro
Copy link
Member

Personally I disagree, read receipt support was IMO never a good idea. If this gets added I implore you to require the recipient to opt-in each time a read receipt is delivered to a message sender. Requesting one on Send is OK I guess, but again not a fan of the whole idea.

@marclaporte
Copy link
Member

marclaporte commented Sep 11, 2023

"require the recipient to opt-in each time a read receipt is delivered to a message sender": Maybe there could be an option to always opt in for specific senders. So I may be OK that specific people have this information all the time.

@resu-cireneg Please elaborate on your needs so we can find the right options/preferences so each user can set it up the way they want it.

@marclaporte marclaporte added the awaiting feedback please follow up! label Nov 4, 2023
@marclaporte
Copy link
Member

@resu-cireneg

@marclaporte
Copy link
Member

@resu-cireneg We need your feedback on current issue and #703

Else, we will close this as it's controversial.

@marclaporte
Copy link
Member

@resu-cireneg Last call

@kroky kroky closed this as completed in #703 Feb 1, 2024
@marclaporte
Copy link
Member

This features in now in Cypht 2.0

For Cypht 2.1, it should be made optional (default off)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
awaiting feedback please follow up!
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants