You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Add abstraction to simplify staged animations? The abstraction would take a set of transitions (wrapped in function instances) and then oversee their sequential execution. It should enable easy parameterization of stage durations, be cancelable, etc...
Two potential cases:
Independent transitions: no element-level chaining. Specify function list and list of durations (or offsets) and run each stage accordingly.
Dependent transitions: transitions are chained per-element (e.g., .each("end", next()), allowing staggering to propagate. The transition wrapper function might take a "next" parameter in addition to a duration to avoid hard-wiring the next transition.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I think I'm happy with the level of support we have now, which includes transition.transition() and transition.each("end", callback). We might consider adding a transition.transition("end"), leaving the default as transition.transition("start").
Add abstraction to simplify staged animations? The abstraction would take a set of transitions (wrapped in function instances) and then oversee their sequential execution. It should enable easy parameterization of stage durations, be cancelable, etc...
Two potential cases:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: