See, and coalesce ideas from the links below (and more)
Here, we propose methods for grouping, organizing, and categorizing these tools for motivating effective giving and action:
{% embed url="https://daaronr.github.io/ea_giving_barriers/chapters/tools.html" %} Barriers project (Reinstein) {% endembed %}
- Theoretical frameworks --> tool categories
- Certain outcomes are relevant to some tools only
- Atheoretical 'trying different marketing colors' and tools that push several buttons
{% embed url="https://daaronr.github.io/ea_giving_barriers/chapters/tools.html" %} Barriers project (Reinstein) {% endembed %}
{% embed url="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Sps58H0LKvoLvzSSa2Yav3kFO1vDSVzsYXoYyWzvol0/edit#" %} GWWC brainstorming {% endembed %}
As well as
{% embed url="https://airtable.com/shrUGJuhyxrKGMEUm" %}
- identifiable victims vs statistical (etc), (DR: Some groups have principled objections to presenting identified victims; which ones do not?)
- emotional vs factual/statements,
- videos v images v text,
- positive v negative valence,
- opportunity v obligation,
- cause areas (Not sure what exactly this meant)
- different framings for specific EA orgs
- e.g., for GWWC they want to test 1% v 10% pledge asks,
- for CES they want to test saving-democracy v representation messaging,
- for Humane League they want to test different types of animals, etc)