Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
44 lines (31 loc) · 1.6 KB

File metadata and controls

44 lines (31 loc) · 1.6 KB

Tools and trials: overview

See, and coalesce ideas from the links below (and more)

Discussion

Here, we propose methods for grouping, organizing, and categorizing these tools for motivating effective giving and action:

{% embed url="https://daaronr.github.io/ea_giving_barriers/chapters/tools.html" %} Barriers project (Reinstein) {% endembed %}

  1. Theoretical frameworks --> tool categories
  2. Certain outcomes are relevant to some tools only
  3. Atheoretical 'trying different marketing colors' and tools that push several buttons

Existing categorisation

{% embed url="https://daaronr.github.io/ea_giving_barriers/chapters/tools.html" %} Barriers project (Reinstein) {% endembed %}

{% embed url="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Sps58H0LKvoLvzSSa2Yav3kFO1vDSVzsYXoYyWzvol0/edit#" %} GWWC brainstorming {% endembed %}

As well as

{% embed url="https://airtable.com/shrUGJuhyxrKGMEUm" %}

Some tools and tests of high-interest (overview, quick presentations)

Nick Fitz: "some quick types of different tests/questions EA orgs are interested in"

  • identifiable victims vs statistical (etc), (DR: Some groups have principled objections to presenting identified victims; which ones do not?)
  • emotional vs factual/statements,
  • videos v images v text,
  • positive v negative valence,
  • opportunity v obligation,
  • cause areas (Not sure what exactly this meant)
  • different framings for specific EA orgs
    • e.g., for GWWC they want to test 1% v 10% pledge asks,
    • for CES they want to test saving-democracy v representation messaging,
    • for Humane League they want to test different types of animals, etc)