Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Void Fortress Armor Memory Leak? #53

Closed
Circine opened this issue Aug 13, 2019 · 5 comments
Closed

Void Fortress Armor Memory Leak? #53

Circine opened this issue Aug 13, 2019 · 5 comments
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@Circine
Copy link

Circine commented Aug 13, 2019

If I equip any of the Void Fortress pieces and open my inventory, I can watch java's memory usage in task manager balloon at up to 50MB per second. Minecraft's used/allocated memory doesn't change. The more pieces the faster it rises. This'll go on until I run out of RAM and everything slows to a crawl.
Doesn't seem to happen outside of the inventory screen.

@daedalus4096 daedalus4096 added the bug Something isn't working label Aug 14, 2019
@shoverno2
Copy link

Some maybe useful information
latest.log
debug.log

@bigenergy
Copy link

+1

@Vapaman
Copy link

Vapaman commented Jul 7, 2021

Can confirm that it only happens when the armor is rendering.

Edit: I can also confirm that isn't a mod conflict; tested with only thaumic wonders and its depencies and this memory leak is still a thing.

@Dearerburrito
Copy link

Alright after some testing with visuals and cosmetic armor I don't think rendering is causing the leak. I think it's more likely to be a bug with warpshell. I think it has to do with the interaction between warp and the special 'Warpshell' enchantment. Maybe a calculation error or a bug with adding extra enchantments to the armor. Either way, can't find a fix.

@daedalus4096
Copy link
Owner

This issue should now be fixed in version 1.8.3.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants