Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Target .NET Standard 2.0 instead or in addition to 1.0? #11

Closed
divega opened this issue Jul 24, 2019 · 3 comments · Fixed by #12
Closed

Target .NET Standard 2.0 instead or in addition to 1.0? #11

divega opened this issue Jul 24, 2019 · 3 comments · Fixed by #12

Comments

@divega
Copy link
Collaborator

divega commented Jul 24, 2019

@davidfowl, @damieng I was wondering if the package should target 2.0 instead of 1.0 as the project currently does. I know some reasons we usually recommend 2.0, but because this one doesn’t have any dependencies, I am not sure the same reasons apply.
@davidfowl
Copy link
Collaborator

Yes it should 😬

@damieng
Copy link
Owner

damieng commented Jul 24, 2019

So switch it to 2.0 instead of or in addition to?

@davidfowl
Copy link
Collaborator

Switch to 2.0 drop 1.0

@damieng damieng mentioned this issue Jul 24, 2019
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Switch to .NET Standard 2.0. damieng/Linq.Translations
3 participants
@davidfowl @damieng @divega