Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

May be we can get some useful info form QDAC3 #59

Closed
ghost opened this issue Oct 24, 2016 · 6 comments
Closed

May be we can get some useful info form QDAC3 #59

ghost opened this issue Oct 24, 2016 · 6 comments
Labels

Comments

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Oct 24, 2016

Hi,

delphimvcframework is a very good Framework, but incomplete.

May be we can get some useful info form QDAC3.

Like qxml, qmsgpack, qamf, qmacros and so on.

And we can get QDAC3 form
SITE:http://blog.qdac.cc/?page_id=139
SVN:svn://www.qdac.cc/QDAC3

Thanks.

@danieleteti
Copy link
Owner

Please, expose your needs not other framework to just "get info". It is a time waste for the dmvc team. Many things that QDAC3 does are already provided by DelphiMVCFramework, so just ask about specific things and we'll try to help you.

@ghost
Copy link
Author

ghost commented Oct 24, 2016

Macros and Xml support

@danieleteti
Copy link
Owner

XML support is in the roadmap and it is not complet to do, but it is simply not so requested by the user so it is not a priority right now.

About "Macros" I've some problem to understand. I found QMacros (https://sourceforge.net/projects/qdac3/files/3.0/QMacros/) but it is a library, what you need from that library that dmvcframework doesn't support?

@ghost
Copy link
Author

ghost commented Oct 24, 2016

Macros is like stringReplace, but faster and easy use.
It is very useful for web page.

@danieleteti
Copy link
Owner

Did you checked mustache in dmvc? It is already used for the server side views and it is much better than a simple string replace. Check the server side view samples.

@ghost
Copy link
Author

ghost commented Oct 24, 2016

Thanks, I'll check it completely.

@ghost ghost closed this as completed Oct 24, 2016
This issue was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant