Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Security #4

Open
danisztls opened this issue Sep 27, 2021 · 0 comments
Open

Security #4

danisztls opened this issue Sep 27, 2021 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation

Comments

@danisztls
Copy link
Owner

One of the goals of making encrypted backups is protecting the user data in the cloud from scanning and leakages. But I'm not a security expert so I can't guarantee that. Much of the trust is placed on gocryptfs.

Secure by obscurity, as in hiding whatever do you use, is tempting as it's a real possibility that an attacker could find an exploit while exploring this repo. But the odds are as low as the odds of one making a return on such time investment.

Cloud storage is not safe as is. And if current trends continues it shouldn't be long until the vulnerability industry reaches retail level.

This script runs locally on the machine and does not require superadmin privileges or open ports. And as I see any vulnerability would require access to the local system or the data in the cloud which is pretty much game over if you are doing nothing.

@danisztls danisztls added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Sep 27, 2021
@danisztls danisztls self-assigned this Sep 27, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant