You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Right now it's hard-coded at 2, but it's easy to make this stuff N-dimensional. May have downstream impacts on other plots, though, which we'll want to take a hard look at.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Another thing I think would be really, really neat would be to have something where we could correlate clade presence/absence with each of those dimensions and then plot an N-dimensional treespace above the diagonal and small phylogenies ON the diagonal with the clades highlighted where presence/absence was most correlated with that NMDS axis.
Following on that last bit: having small trees on the diagonal is probably going to be completely unreadable for any large topology, so (as the product of a conversation with Rob) maybe the thing to do is make the pairs plot for topology and then find a way to print the axis loadings on an MCC tree, which we would just return as a separate plot.
Right now it's hard-coded at 2, but it's easy to make this stuff N-dimensional. May have downstream impacts on other plots, though, which we'll want to take a hard look at.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: