Code quality fix - The members of an interface declaration or class should appear in a pre-defined order.

[faisal-hameed]

This pull request is focused on resolving occurrences of Sonar rule
squid:S1213 - The members of an interface declaration or class should appear in a pre-defined order.
You can find more information about the issue here:
https://dev.eclipse.org/sonar/rules/show/squid:S1213

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Faisal Hameed

[coveralls]

Coverage remained the same at 34.167% when pulling 1fc52ab on DevFactory:release/ordering-of-member-should-be-correct-fix-1 into d074b3a on darcy-framework:master.

[alechenninger]

Hi @faisal-hameed . I should publish this more widely, but for our code style we follow the Google Java style guide1 which does not have an explicit ordering requirement, only that ordering has some logical reasoning. In these examples, I have put the static factories (essentially named constructors) before the normal constructor because I believe when someone is reading these classes, the named constructors to be more useful, since these are typically how these objects will be created.