You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
After speaking with author of Stitch, I am planning to add a result narrowing functionality, where you can specify multiple filters to shrink the set of files considered.
As part of this work, a non-fuzzy way of specifying search needs to be added, of which I am considering regex. There was a similar functionality in Docfd called content requirement expression, but was removed from 3.0.0 as it felt awkward to use in practice, being a limited version of the search expression.
So the question is whether regex should be added, and if so, should both line based (i.e. regular grep) and token based regex (e.g. ?ello w*d can match hello and world separated by other tokens or lines as long as it is under the limit used by the regular mode) be added?
After speaking with author of Stitch, I am planning to add a result narrowing functionality, where you can specify multiple filters to shrink the set of files considered.
As part of this work, a non-fuzzy way of specifying search needs to be added, of which I am considering regex. There was a similar functionality in Docfd called content requirement expression, but was removed from 3.0.0 as it felt awkward to use in practice, being a limited version of the search expression.
So the question is whether regex should be added, and if so, should both line based (i.e. regular grep) and token based regex (e.g.
?ello w*d
can matchhello
andworld
separated by other tokens or lines as long as it is under the limit used by the regular mode) be added?(Tagging people who I think are likely to be regular users: @kseistrup @ludwig-austermann)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: