Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Wrong import statement in Language/Libraries_and_Scripts/Imports/namespace_changes_t10 #39

Closed
crelier opened this issue Mar 2, 2016 · 3 comments
Closed

Wrong import statement in Language/Libraries_and_Scripts/Imports/namespace_changes_t10 #39

crelier opened this issue Mar 2, 2016 · 3 comments
Assignees
@sgrekhov

Comments

@crelier
Copy link

crelier commented Mar 2, 2016

The self import statement should be:
import "namespace_changes_t10.dart";
@sgrekhov
Copy link
Contributor

sgrekhov commented Mar 3, 2016

@crelier there is this statement in the test. What's wrong?

@sgrekhov sgrekhov self-assigned this Mar 3, 2016
@sgrekhov sgrekhov added the type-question A question about expected behavior or functionality label Mar 3, 2016
@crelier
Copy link
Author

crelier commented Mar 3, 2016

Sorry, I should also have written what I am seeing:
import "1_Imports_A02_t10.dart";

I suspect you may have already fixed it, since you are asking.

Our current version is this one:
commit 3ed795e
Author: Sergey G. Grekhov sgrekhov@unipro.ru
Date: Tue Sep 29 11:48:38 2015 +0600

This was referenced Mar 3, 2016
Closed
Closed
@sgrekhov sgrekhov removed the type-question A question about expected behavior or functionality label Mar 4, 2016
@sgrekhov
Copy link
Contributor

sgrekhov commented Mar 4, 2016

Ok. No this issue in the current version of co19 tests. Closed

@sgrekhov sgrekhov closed this as completed Mar 4, 2016
@iarkh iarkh mentioned this issue Mar 27, 2019
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@sgrekhov sgrekhov

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@sgrekhov @crelier