chore(scala-steward): Improve dependency grouping

[mpro7]

Pull Request Checklist

Task Description/Number

Issue Number: N/A

This PR split major and minor dependency update groups. Due to breaking changes that major updates could potentially include, is better to keep them separated to minor updates.

PR Type

• chore: maintenance tasks (no production code change)
• docs: documentation changes (no production code change)
• feat: represents a new feature
• fix: represents bug fixes
• perf: performance improvements
• refactor: represents production code refactoring
• test: all about tests: adding, refactoring tests (no production code change)

Basic Requirements for bug fixes and features

• Tests for the changes have been added
• Docs have been added / updated

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

• Yes

Does this PR change client-test-data?

• Yes

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: 27 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (3e95d71) 11.68% compared to head (9fdfb6f) 11.69%.
Report is 4 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2919   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   11.68%   11.69%           
=======================================
  Files         251      251           
  Lines       23065    23068    +3     
=======================================
+ Hits         2695     2697    +2     
- Misses      20370    20371    +1     

Files	Coverage Δ
.../slice/admin/domain/service/KnoraProjectRepo.scala	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...bapi/src/main/scala/dsp/valueobjects/Project.scala	86.74% <85.71%> (+0.32%)	⬆️
...ce/admin/domain/service/ProjectExportService.scala	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...lice/admin/repo/service/KnoraProjectRepoLive.scala	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...slice/admin/domain/service/ProjectADMService.scala	11.11% <19.04%> (-0.26%)	⬇️

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.