Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: activate not-exists for link prop #992

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Apr 12, 2023

Conversation

Vijeinath
Copy link
Collaborator

resolves DEV-1966

@Vijeinath Vijeinath requested a review from mdelez as a code owner April 12, 2023 10:09
@Vijeinath Vijeinath self-assigned this Apr 12, 2023
@linear
Copy link

linear bot commented Apr 12, 2023

DEV-1966 Activate not-exists for link

The not exists in the advanced search was commented out for the linking property case. After investigation & fixing a potential bug on the api side, this should be activated

Copy link
Contributor

@EricSommerhalder EricSommerhalder left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, minor comments

@@ -323,45 +323,45 @@ describe('SpecifyPropertyValueComponent', () => {
).toEqual(8);
});

// it('should set the correct comparison operators for a linking property type (on top level)', () => {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this dead code now? I'd delete it if it's not used.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

@Vijeinath Vijeinath Apr 12, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No, I uncommented it so the test is valid for the added notexists case

@@ -2246,54 +2246,54 @@ OFFSET 0
).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
});

// it('Gravsearch query string with no existing LINK property values', () => {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Same as above

@Vijeinath Vijeinath merged commit 25be262 into main Apr 12, 2023
9 checks passed
@Vijeinath Vijeinath deleted the feature/dev-1966-activate-not-exists-for-link branch April 12, 2023 13:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants