Fix/clean npm scripts

[dkastl]

I found the npm scripts a bit difficult to understand, not only from the point of view of the names, but also how they were organized.

I tried to use a scope to group them together, where the "short" command is usually the one, that contains them all.

I haven't done anything with pack and dist. I didn't figure out yet, why there are 6 script entries necessary for something, that probably will be run with CI tools. I also can't think of a case, where all operating systems are built with a single run. I would suggest to reduce those to just pack and dist for the current OS.

[martinheidegger]

Thank you for the PR! Those changes definitely look usable. I added a few comments. Would be nice if you could address them.

[martinheidegger]

Maybe name "start: electron"?

[dkastl]

Yes, I had the same idea first. Will change.

[martinheidegger]

Maybe "start:watch"

[dkastl]

I thought changing this will make some people angry ;-)
But I agree with start:watch.

[dkastl]

FYI, npm install is not run anymore automatically after npm run clean. I think it makes the documentation more consistent to just always have to run npm install.

[dkastl]

@martinheidegger npm-run-all -p start:watch start:electron does run both processes in parallel, but if you start from scratch, it seems that it may happen, that you first had to wait for start:watch to finish, because otherwise webpack would not have finished. The second time it all works.

[martinheidegger]

Oh right! Yes, that is an issue. We would need a start:build script to be executed before npm-run-all

[dkastl]

Oh right! Yes, that is an issue. We would need a start:build script to be executed before npm-run-all

Can we just use build:dev script, because this already exists and isn't really used. build:prod is used for packaging and distributions. Or better rename it to start:build?

[martinheidegger]

Right build:dev is fine.

[martinheidegger]

Can you rebase again (with the removed package-lock.json)?

[dkastl]

@martinheidegger would you mind to do this, because I don't have this cool Git software, that you have ;-)

I'm pretty much done here, so if you want to make this pull request prettier in terms of commit messages, rebasing, squashing and all that stuff, that I needed to consult a manual, please go ahead!

[dkastl]

Rebase looks good to me.