We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
There needs to be some sort of convention to understand how the business key is defined. I'm thinking we use a SK pattern to the configurations.
Somethink like 'DWK Key Pattern' in a box stating '%dataObjectIdentifier_dataObject%_SK'. This would replace stuff like suffix and prefix.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This is done as part of v.1.6.6
Sorry, something went wrong.
RoelantVos
No branches or pull requests
There needs to be some sort of convention to understand how the business key is defined. I'm thinking we use a SK pattern to the configurations.
Somethink like 'DWK Key Pattern' in a box stating '%dataObjectIdentifier_dataObject%_SK'. This would replace stuff like suffix and prefix.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: