Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use staticcheck github.com/databrickslabs/terraform-provider-databricks/... instead of abandoned golangci-lint #602

Closed
nfx opened this issue Apr 21, 2021 · 0 comments · Fixed by #640
Milestone

Comments

@nfx
Copy link
Contributor

nfx commented Apr 21, 2021

go-staticheck is integrated with VSCode and seems to be actively supported.

https://staticcheck.io/docs#running-the-tools

@nfx nfx added this to the v0.3.4 milestone Apr 22, 2021
nfx added a commit that referenced this issue May 10, 2021
* previous solution, golangci-lint, does no longer seem to be actively maintained
* staticcheck is natively integrated with VSCode IDE
* it's easier to have one common and modern linting framework
nfx added a commit that referenced this issue May 10, 2021
* previous solution, golangci-lint, does no longer seem to be actively maintained
* staticcheck is natively integrated with VSCode IDE
* it's easier to have one common and modern linting framework
@nfx nfx closed this as completed in #640 May 10, 2021
nfx added a commit that referenced this issue May 10, 2021
* previous solution, golangci-lint, does no longer seem to be actively maintained
* staticcheck is natively integrated with VSCode IDE
* it's easier to have one common and modern linting framework
michael-berk pushed a commit to michael-berk/terraform-provider-databricks that referenced this issue Feb 15, 2023
* previous solution, golangci-lint, does no longer seem to be actively maintained
* staticcheck is natively integrated with VSCode IDE
* it's easier to have one common and modern linting framework
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant