-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Run via rootless podman or singularity/apptainer? #89
Comments
Without fully understanding the use case I think the answer is yes. With podman, we have 4 options.
|
FWIW we have Can you @asmacdo work with @candleindark and research into possibility of the "non-root" execution of those instances? I think it should be feasible since really there is no need for "outside root" - ports they use are not privileged so for that root also would not be needed. |
@yarikoptic Podman on Smaug is currently @ 3.0.1. Can we have it updated to the current version 4.4.1? |
I've tried to backport 4.3.1 (present in debian unstable) but "no good". Why would we need 4.4.1? is there a way for user-space installation (attn @asmacdo)? |
Seems like it's possible but probably not worth the effort. |
All the documentation I have been reading is at version 4+. I was just wondering if we can upgrade to version 4+ just for consistency. It actually don't have to be 4.4.1 in particular. |
Datalad-registry has been run by Podman for more than 7 days. I think we should close this issue. |
feel welcome to close issues you consider addressed. Where possible/relevant -- reference a commit or PR which closed it. In this case I guess it might benefit from a quick section in README.md on podman and settings to use to avoid containers being killed. |
Note: |
could we consider #102 as a replacement for this one? ;) |
Sure, let's close this one. |
We should check with @asmacdo if that would be possible to avoid possible "kill all by using docker" scenario ;)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: