Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Analysis of meals on speech days #172

Merged
merged 4 commits into from Feb 13, 2017

Conversation

fgrehm
Copy link
Contributor

@fgrehm fgrehm commented Dec 27, 2016

Related to GH-137

This also has the the bonus of setting up serenata_toolbox. It is only used for this notebook ATM but I can look into updating other stuff to make use of it at another day this or next week 🤘

requirements.txt Outdated
@@ -1,2 +1,4 @@
-e git+https://github.com/datasciencebr/serenata-toolbox.git@6126436#egg=serenata-toolbox
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@cuducos You recently removed the -e from Rosie. Was for not saving it inside the project folder, right?

If that's the case, can you change for the version after @cuducos' commit?

Copy link
Collaborator

@cuducos cuducos Dec 27, 2016

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yep. -e means editable mode, so it copies the package source code to your project. We don't need that here ; )

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sure! I'll get that changed later on today 👍

requirements.txt Outdated
@@ -1,2 +1,4 @@
git+https://github.com/datasciencebr/serenata-toolbox.git@6126436#egg=serenata-toolbox
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@Irio @cuducos I've removed the -e but was wondering if you guys had any thoughts on keeping it locked to a version like I did here? I like that it makes things reproductible and makes it clear when we expect people to update the package on their local installations but I noticed you guys didn't do it on rosie 💭

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Very very personal opinion here: locking the version surely is a good thing, but I think it should be done in a neat way. It's a good point you raise here, I don't think we've pondered on it in this context… Anyway: a neat way would be to use GitHug tags, or (I prefer) uploading it to PyPI.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yeah, uploading to pypi would be ideal, but a git tag might be the easiest way to move forward for now 💭

Copy link
Collaborator

@cuducos cuducos Dec 30, 2016

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@Irio: Any ideas? If the silence remains (drama 👑 ) I upload it to PyPI next week hahaha…

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

…to meals-on-speech-days

Conflicts:
       requirements.txt
@fgrehm
Copy link
Contributor Author

fgrehm commented Feb 13, 2017

@Irio @cuducos since master already have serenata-toolbox, I guess this can be merged now

@cuducos cuducos merged commit 8f8e630 into okfn-brasil:master Feb 13, 2017
Irio pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 27, 2018
…mbursements

Add info about deleted reimbursements to the UI
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants