Confirm accuracy of current list of Categories of Stakeholders

[flyingzumwalt]

@rgardaphe's notes in this these slides include a preliminary list of stakeholders for whom we want to sketch User Journeys. That list was generated by @ebarry and @flyingzumwalt during the sprint in October.

I've entered that list into a Data Together Stakeholders sheet on Airtable.com (super useful tool!) and mapped those categories to real stakeholders who we're engaged with or could engage with.

We can close this issue when @ebarry @titaniumbones @dcwalk @b5 and @flyingzumwalt have confirmed that the current list is sufficiently accurate for us to proceed with generating user journeys. Everyone is welcome to chime in on this -- please do -- we just won't close this issue until we have input and agreement from those people.

The current list of categories is:

• Application Developers (D-Web)
• Community Orgs working for equity
• Federal Data Managers
• State & Local Data Managers
• Community Science Groups
• Crowdsourcing Initiatives
• Networks of data contributors
• Autonomous Data Collection Efforts
• Researchers - institutional
• Researchers - independent
• Labs sharing data
• IOT device manufacturers
• VR, AR, MR and Game Developers
• GLAM Institutions
• Internet Infrastructure

Question for @ebarry -- is there any way we can consolidate these ones under a single heading?:

• Community Science Groups
• Crowdsourcing Initiatives
• Networks of data contributors
• Autonomous Data Collection Efforts
  ... and which heading does Public Lab fall under?