-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 17
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Sutil without fable (aspnetcore only) #50
Comments
Thank you for those very kind words! |
my idea was a bit like Websharper, would also sutil be available to be used that way, |
Sutil uses Fable to convert F# into JS. Fable no longer uses Babel, if that's what you mean? |
yes sorry , closing this as makes no sense. thank you! |
I was wondering if i can integrate sutil in a standard aspnetcore MVC app (server side rendered) from the www root folder, without requiring/using fable at all.
Is the app.js file generated even without fable.js but purely including sutil package?
if so maybe adding a copy to the wwwroot folder would already make it work also for server aspnetcore? thanks have a great day and amazing project 🥇 🔝 🏆 !
maybe if this is possible it could be worth a template , like for server side rendering only (when client reload doesnt matter much)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: