Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

alias test example wrong? #5384

Open
1 task done
ialdg opened this issue Apr 27, 2024 · 0 comments
Open
1 task done

alias test example wrong? #5384

ialdg opened this issue Apr 27, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
content Improvements or additions to content improvement Use this when an area of the docs needs improvement as it's currently unclear

Comments

@ialdg
Copy link
Contributor

ialdg commented Apr 27, 2024

Contributions

  • I have read the contribution docs, and understand what's expected of me.

Link to the page on docs.getdbt.com requiring updates

https://docs.getdbt.com/reference/resource-configs/alias

What part(s) of the page would you like to see updated?

Hi. Regarding the example of alias for "test" it's said that: "When using --store-failures, this would return the name analytics.finance.orders_order_id_unique_order_id_test in the database."
But in this link: https://docs.getdbt.com/reference/resource-configs/store_failures#description
, it's said this: "By default, store_failures uses a schema named dbt_test__audit, but, you can configure the schema to a different value."
, and since at the alias example no default override is stated, I think the example should be something like this:
analytics.dbt_test__audit.orders_order_id_unique_order_id_test
Regards.
IL.

Additional information

No response

@ialdg ialdg added content Improvements or additions to content improvement Use this when an area of the docs needs improvement as it's currently unclear labels Apr 27, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
content Improvements or additions to content improvement Use this when an area of the docs needs improvement as it's currently unclear
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant