Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rectify logging info to correctly reflect MWL SCP from which MWL items are found when using new archive attribute coercion to merge from MWL #3783

Closed
vrindanayak opened this issue Aug 24, 2022 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Milestone

Comments

@vrindanayak
Copy link
Member

Currently, archive logs local MWL SCP AET even when external MWL SCP is queried for MWL items on coercing received objects' attributes using new archive attribute coercion for merging from MWL.

[org.dcm4chee.arc.coerce.impl.MergeMWLCoercionProcessor] (EE-ManagedExecutorService-default-Thread-9) Found 1 matching MWL Items in DCM4CHEE

image

Related #3473

@vrindanayak vrindanayak added the enhancement New feature or request label Aug 24, 2022
@vrindanayak vrindanayak added this to the 5.28.0 milestone Aug 24, 2022
@vrindanayak vrindanayak self-assigned this Aug 24, 2022
@vrindanayak vrindanayak changed the title Rectify logging info to correctly reflect MWL SCP from which MWL items are found for merge from MWL coercion using new attribute coercion Rectify logging info to correctly reflect MWL SCP from which MWL items are found for new archive attribute coercion to merge from MWL Aug 24, 2022
@vrindanayak vrindanayak changed the title Rectify logging info to correctly reflect MWL SCP from which MWL items are found for new archive attribute coercion to merge from MWL Rectify logging info to correctly reflect MWL SCP from which MWL items are found when using new archive attribute coercion to merge from MWL Aug 24, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant