Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Comparison to ResUNet++ #3

Closed
Mano3 opened this issue Sep 14, 2020 · 1 comment
Closed

Comparison to ResUNet++ #3

Mano3 opened this issue Sep 14, 2020 · 1 comment

Comments

@Mano3
Copy link

Mano3 commented Sep 14, 2020

Hi, you have mentioned in your paper ResUNet++, which is also your work.
Also, I've seen that you are working on ResUNet++ + CRF + TTA.
Can you make a comparison between the 3 on the presented datasets?
Is any one of these models superior to the others?
Thanks.

@DebeshJha
Copy link
Owner

Hi,

Thanks for your query. The combination of ResUNet++, CRF, and TTA is data-dependent. However, I would prefer "ResUNet++, +CRF+ TTA" as they perform well on the cross-dataset or generalizability test.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants