You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I have been contacted via e-mail by the Free Software Foundation Europe (FSFE). They are proposing that we adopt the REUSE specifications developed by the FSFE. They have shared the following links related to this:
I have now received a "Licensing Review Report" from the FSFE regarding this and related repositories.
The recommended actions are:
1. Please add the copyright and licensing information to each plain text file in your repository that do not currently have a comment header.
2. You may wish to place certain files that can be considered “insignificant” into the “public domain.
Regarding recommended action 1, we like the idea and may apply this at some point.
Regarding recommended action 2, we don't see a lot of benefit, since the entire repository is already covered by the permissive Apache 2.0 license, therefore we are not likely to apply this.
We discussed this again on the 06 Oct 2021 Universal Resolver Work Item Call and decided to leave the issue open. We believe adding copyright/license information to each file indeed has some advantages.
I have been contacted via e-mail by the Free Software Foundation Europe (FSFE). They are proposing that we adopt the REUSE specifications developed by the FSFE. They have shared the following links related to this:
They have also shared the following document:
FSFE - 1 - Best Practices for Software Licensing.pdf
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: