Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consider REUSE specifications developed by FSFE #85

Open
peacekeeper opened this issue Feb 25, 2020 · 3 comments
Open

Consider REUSE specifications developed by FSFE #85

peacekeeper opened this issue Feb 25, 2020 · 3 comments

Comments

@peacekeeper
Copy link
Member

I have been contacted via e-mail by the Free Software Foundation Europe (FSFE). They are proposing that we adopt the REUSE specifications developed by the FSFE. They have shared the following links related to this:

They have also shared the following document:

FSFE - 1 - Best Practices for Software Licensing.pdf

@peacekeeper
Copy link
Member Author

I have now received a "Licensing Review Report" from the FSFE regarding this and related repositories.

The recommended actions are:

1. Please add the copyright and licensing information to each plain text file in your repository that do not currently have a comment header.
2. You may wish to place certain files that can be considered “insignificant” into the “public domain.

See the report for details:

FSFE Licensing Review Report (universal did resolver) .pdf

@peacekeeper
Copy link
Member Author

We reviewed this on the 14 Jul 2021 Universal Resolver Work Item Call:

  • Regarding recommended action 1, we like the idea and may apply this at some point.
  • Regarding recommended action 2, we don't see a lot of benefit, since the entire repository is already covered by the permissive Apache 2.0 license, therefore we are not likely to apply this.

@peacekeeper
Copy link
Member Author

We discussed this again on the 06 Oct 2021 Universal Resolver Work Item Call and decided to leave the issue open. We believe adding copyright/license information to each file indeed has some advantages.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant