-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 393
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
EPIC: Improve the Debates component: Detail #6002
Comments
After reviewing this, we think this should be converted to an EPIC, or at least treated as such, given the amount of features to add. |
@decidim/product I have several questions on this issue:
|
We're pending updating this EPIC and making the other issues as we've discussed. |
I wanted to start working on it, since I finished my assigned tasks in the current sprint... The hashtags issue blocks the related AC in #6003. |
@mrcasals working on it, if you give me 10' you've got them all ready. |
Epic updated now with the corresponding issues |
Yay, thank you very much! I'll review them as soon as I have some time! 😄 |
@mrcasals regarding your questions:
Yes, see issue #6185
Check #6186 por updated AC
See #6186 for mockups
Yes, see #6186
Yes, in proposals
Hashtags exist in meetings and proposals. Participants should be able to filter by any created hashtag. If at any time we need more moderation mechanisms (comments can be moderated now) we will implement them 😊 |
ref: PP022
User story
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
As a participant I'm missing several options when it comes to promoting discussions on the platform: I can open a debate but I can't close it, nor can I edit it as the deliberation proceeds. I can add hashtags but they are not parsed as such, and I also cannot perform some common actions in Decidim, such as endorsing, embedding or reporting a debate if it is inappropriate content.
Describe the solution you'd like
As a participant I want to be able to:
Describe alternatives you've considered
As most of these are features that we've already implemented there are not much alternatives to consider.
Other features (specially Closing a Debate) there could be more alternatives.
Additional context
URL: https://www.decidim.barcelona/processes/PlaLitoralBCN/f/2976/debates/57
🎨 Frontend
Does this issue could impact on users private data?
No
Acceptance criteria
See on every issue
Related issues
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: