Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

DGB support #1992

Closed
chappjc opened this issue Dec 9, 2022 · 0 comments · Fixed by #1993
Closed

DGB support #1992

chappjc opened this issue Dec 9, 2022 · 0 comments · Fixed by #1993
Assignees
@chappjc
Labels
wallet Client wallet backends

Comments

@chappjc
Copy link
Member

chappjc commented Dec 9, 2022 •
edited

Latest dgb core releases (7.17.x) are on par with bitcoin core 0.17, so that's good.

That also means no compact filters (and there's no neutrino chain service fork), thus full-node clients only.
Also non-segwit. But does have segwit.
This is very much like how we started with litecoind initially, so should be fairly trivial.

Hopefully tx and block serialization is unchanged from btc. There does not seem to be a custom address format, so btcutil.Address should be fine with it.

I see a big sync to v22 features in https://github.com/DigiByte-Core/digibyte/pull/63, which brings them up to speed with bitcoin core v22 (including segwith and hopefully compact block filters.).
@chappjc chappjc self-assigned this Dec 9, 2022
@chappjc chappjc mentioned this issue Dec 10, 2022
Merged
@chappjc chappjc added the wallet Client wallet backends label Dec 29, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@chappjc chappjc

Labels
wallet Client wallet backends
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

DigiByte chappjc/dcrdex
1 participant
@chappjc