New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
DigiByte #1993
DigiByte #1993
Conversation
A couple remaining items I haven't gotten to:
And test, of course. |
1436d56
to
0c8b0f9
Compare
In the last commit, are any of the images besides Should v7.17.2 be ok? Running on testnet not finding any blocks. Any tips? |
No I'll rm the ones we don't like.
https://github.com/DigiByte-Core/digibyte/releases/tag/v7.17.3 But there's a nasty bug that makes "Loading block index..." at startup take in excess of 24 hrs. The testnet seeders have been down. That's another thing I raised with their community. For now, you'll have to replace the following lines: without the "seed." prefix to the host name. Some other possible nodes to add manually are 91.197.230.186, 24.101.88.154, 47.75.38.245, 199.47.64.33, 8.214.25.169 |
The harness seems to to be working on simnet. Not sure about testnet... It looks like the dcrdex harness needs for dgb to be added and a market for it. |
c828cc9
to
60d7ac4
Compare
Squashed in a few fixes: https://github.com/decred/dcrdex/compare/c828cc98add27773b0304c681ed2fc20ff27cf19..60d7ac475299ec38acbb35d59a6cd72ab7f39ffa |
Thanks for all the hard work! Do you have an ETA of when DigiByte may get integrated? |
Things are looking good. We've added the remaining work to our next proposal and I anticipate we can finish things up within weeks. Getting a DigiByte market up and running is another hurdle. We're working on improving our market-making tools. The rudimentary tools being released in 0.6 (any day now) can help bootstrap a market, but provide few knobs for fine-tuned bot behavior. We'll keep at it and keep in touch. |
Thanks for the prompt reply @buck54321! I will work on getting the DigiByte community involved once DGB is live on the platform. I think there are quite a few people that are excited about Decred DEX. Cheers. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I doubt it would work anyway, because of the segwit misalignment, but when trying to trade, I see dgb wallet has no network peers (check your network or firewall)
.
client/asset/dgb/dgb.go
Outdated
|
||
var ( | ||
fallbackFeeKey = "fallbackfee" | ||
configOpts = []*asset.ConfigOption{ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks like btc.RPCConfigOpts
and btc.CommonConfigOpts
will work.
5398837
to
2371603
Compare
Amazing stuff @chappjc @buck54321! Are those screenshots actual orders? Was the other code fixes what you discussed before? Cheers. |
We ran a few trades with this PR. Looks good so far. We put up the PR in December as a quick initial feasibility check, but today the Decred stakeholders approved a broader initiative that included Digibyte integration, so it got moving again. https://proposals.decred.org/record/ca6b749
We're still targeting the released versions of Digibyte (v7.17.3), which doesn't include the regtest/simnet changes to make mining easier, like the It would also be good if the testnet issues were addressed, but we can work around it since it doesn't affect simnet or mainnet in practice. I'll probably have some final questions before we release though. Stuff related to fee rates, dust limits, tx/block serialization, dandelion, etc. Will get back once more on the dex team have tested and reviewed. |
Rebased with #2196 merged, adding in |
5e094eb
to
de60be0
Compare
simnet_trade tests OK, but you can't run them all at once because the digibyte node quickly becomes impossible to mine. You have to restart all the harnesses after each small test. For the same reason, loadbot isn't gonna be usable until the
|
Squashed the fixups. |
Revalidated trades again today. Any lingering concerns? |
I'll review this tomorrow. I'm sure it's g2g. |
Thanks for all the hard work guys! How are things looking? |
Work is merged. Didn't make it into 0.6.0, but we already have an 0.6.1 working for a (hopefully) quick follow-up and DigiByte will be in that release. |
Looks like there is more progress here guys! Awesome job and thank you! |
I see 0.6.1 was just released. Great work. Is DigiByte confirmed in that release? |
Resolves #1992
Regnet cannot be mined too quickly. https://twitter.com/chappjc/status/1601403517151113216?t=-H0D1YgQvpu2kvk5rMi8MQ&s=1
I still need to verify serialization is unchanged.
https://digibyte.org/docs/integrationguide.pdf