Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Automated tweets for Politeia activity #102

Open
xaur opened this issue Feb 5, 2019 · 8 comments
Open

Automated tweets for Politeia activity #102

xaur opened this issue Feb 5, 2019 · 8 comments
Labels
dev Programming or development might be needed engagement Anything that directly contributes to onboarding and engaging new and existing users

Comments

@xaur
Copy link
Collaborator

xaur commented Feb 5, 2019

Pros:

  • inform more people early
  • increase Politeia engagement
  • more Twitter "churn" around Politeia
  • extra discussion on Twitter (which has large audience)
    • more about generating awareness and interest rather than making good decisions

Cons and concerns:

  • spam: A lot of automated Politeia tweets may upset some and lead to unfollows
    • esp. for bad proposals
    • esp. for people who already subscribed via email
  • abuse: Fully automated tweets via decredproject accounts may be abused to get visibility for promotion
  • confusion: People may mis-interpret mere proposal submission as that Decred is going to implement all the crazy stuff

Implementation and considerations:

  • bot is necessary, doing it manually is tedious
  • use dedicated account over decredproject?
    • will need promotion to boostrap, else it fails the main goal of informing wide audience
    • allows opt-in subscription for close followers
    • allows more flexibility and more detailed updates, compared to decredproject
  • tweet text
  • events:
    • new proposal published, proposal edited (significantly), vote started, X days left for vote, vote finished
    • mid-vote and post-vote tweets can include intermediate and final stats
    • if post-voting stages are formalized in proposal lifecycle, can tweet those too

Discussions:

@xaur xaur mentioned this issue Feb 5, 2019
10 tasks
@xaur
Copy link
Collaborator Author

xaur commented Feb 5, 2019

Experimental Twitter account, for now in manual mode: https://twitter.com/pi_digest

@xaur
Copy link
Collaborator Author

xaur commented Feb 8, 2019

@xaur xaur added dev Programming or development might be needed engagement Anything that directly contributes to onboarding and engaging new and existing users labels Feb 12, 2019
@xaur
Copy link
Collaborator Author

xaur commented Feb 14, 2019

Consider select great comments for tweeting. For example, when something collects 10-15 upvotes.

@0xmzz
Copy link

0xmzz commented Feb 19, 2019

If we do this lets automate updates to the Linkedin Pi page as well https://www.linkedin.com/showcase/decred-politeia/?viewAsMember=true

@xaur
Copy link
Collaborator Author

xaur commented Feb 28, 2019

Besides to-be-automated pi_crumbs we also have manually composed slices_of_pi now.

@RichardRed0x do you think pi_crumbs should also RT slices automatically, to act as a full resolution, never miss anything, single subscription point?

@RichardRed0x
Copy link

@xaur, I hadn't considered that. I think they should be separate, as one is just simple template tweets and the other is not bound to be neutral in the same way. It is free to follow as many twitter accounts as one likes. I am not a twitter expert though so curious to hear what anyone who is thinks.

@RichardRed0x
Copy link

Regarding the automation of @pi_crumbs, I think I can probably get something working in R now, but not in the immediate future.

@xaur
Copy link
Collaborator Author

xaur commented Mar 9, 2019

Politeia needs some notification mechanism that can send events to Twitter and Matrix, not just email.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
dev Programming or development might be needed engagement Anything that directly contributes to onboarding and engaging new and existing users
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants