Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Contribution: Add a protocol to raise issues #89

Closed
lucashervier opened this issue Jan 27, 2022 · 3 comments · Fixed by #90
Closed

Contribution: Add a protocol to raise issues #89

lucashervier opened this issue Jan 27, 2022 · 3 comments · Fixed by #90
Assignees
Labels
continuous-integration Improvement relative to the CI pipeline
Projects

Comments

@lucashervier
Copy link
Collaborator

lucashervier commented Jan 27, 2022

It would be a good practice to have a template when people submit issues. It could even be different template depending on the issue: do we need to reproduce the error, should we have the machine configuration, is it a comfort issue (e.g I can have a hotfix but it would be a nice enhancement that I do not use it), etc....

@justinplakoo do you have any idea how we should manage that ? I think we can add an issue template, what do you think ?

@lucashervier lucashervier added the continuous-integration Improvement relative to the CI pipeline label Jan 27, 2022
@lucashervier lucashervier added this to January - March 2022 in Roadmap Jan 27, 2022
@justinplakoo
Copy link
Member

I think it would be a good solution to add a generic issue template...

@fel-thomas
Copy link
Member

Agree with Justin, I think indeed that it may be time to implement it

@lucashervier
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Look at #90 ;)

@lucashervier lucashervier linked a pull request Feb 7, 2022 that will close this issue
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
continuous-integration Improvement relative to the CI pipeline
Projects
Roadmap
January - March 2022
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants