Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Feature Request] Obtaining global and atomic dipole data from ab initio softwares #555

Open
shuaijiang-ustc opened this issue Sep 6, 2021 · 5 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@shuaijiang-ustc
Copy link

Summary

Since in dpmd v2.0.0, tensor like dipole is supported, I am wondering if tensor data prep is under the way.

Detailed Description

I am conducting ab initio calculations based on Gaussian16. But I am not sure how to get the global and atomic dipole data including the units used in DPMD.

@amcadmus
Copy link
Member

amcadmus commented Sep 6, 2021

Hello, the dipole fitting method is to fit a vector defined on an atom. The "vector" can be atomic dipole, or any other vectorial property. The labels of dipole fitting can be of any unit.

@amcadmus amcadmus transferred this issue from deepmodeling/dpdata Sep 6, 2021
@shuaijiang-ustc
Copy link
Author

I see, thanks. But I found that in DataModifier.py, the trained dipole model is loaded to modify data. So does the dipole unit used in dataset affects this procedure? BTW, is the method in datamodifier.py the same as that used in https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0031215 except that the SPCE charges are replaced by WFCC? Many thanks.

@amcadmus
Copy link
Member

amcadmus commented Sep 8, 2021

No the DataModifier is for the long-range version of DP, which has not been published.

@shuaijiang-ustc
Copy link
Author

Thanks, look foward to the long-range version!

@njzjz njzjz added the enhancement New feature or request label Jan 2, 2022
@njzjz
Copy link
Member

njzjz commented Oct 18, 2023

I recheck this issue and it seems to be a feature request of dpdata instead of DeePMD-kit.

@njzjz njzjz transferred this issue from deepmodeling/deepmd-kit Oct 18, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants