Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

how to use insulation score to identify TAD domains #3

Open
skytguuu opened this issue Dec 23, 2017 · 3 comments
Open

how to use insulation score to identify TAD domains #3

skytguuu opened this issue Dec 23, 2017 · 3 comments

Comments

@skytguuu
Copy link

Hi,

Recently, I am interested to your developed method "insulation score". And I tried to use matrix2insulation.pl to identify TAD domains. I am curious about the result of this perl script. Because, the final result from matrix2insulation.pl is a summary about the boundary location. So, if I want to call TAD domains, is that simply divide the genome into several parts according to this boundaries? For example, if the boundary is chr1:4000000-4500000. Then the TAD domains are two parts?(chr1:0-4000000,chr1:4500000-...)

Could you give me some advise?

Thank you so much!

Best,
Garen

@min1992
Copy link

min1992 commented Apr 3, 2018

Hi,
I am having the same question, so do you solve this question? thank you.

Best

@skytguuu
Copy link
Author

Hi,

My problem has been solved. The reason is happened the label of my input matrix. I changed my middle lane of label as my reference genome.

@blajoie
Copy link
Collaborator

blajoie commented Apr 12, 2018

Sorry for the delay - for the original question, yes it is as simple as that. Simply divide the genome into segments defined by the boundary locations.

One caveat - you may wish to also consider the strength of the boundaries. e.g.

boundaries:
chr1:2500000: strong
chr1:5000000: weak
chr1:5500000: strong

The above reflects 2 distinct tads, however, one may also wish to capture the fact that the major tad (chr1:2500000-5500000) also contains within it a smaller 'sub/nested' tad as evidenced by the much weaker boundary strength.

Hope that is clear.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants