-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 101
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[feature] Move the @Link annotation to a separate maven module #71
Comments
One prereq is to validate that we could display infos as described here
|
Could you elaborate a little more please? I don't see how the comment is relevant to the ticket. |
For the moment, the operator handles then, when we issue this query e.g
If now, we manage the
I created a project and we can't aggregate results into one table unfortunately but nevertheless we can create distinct CRDs |
OK, so there is something I am missing I think :) At the moment, there is no distinct In any case, I see that the comment makes perfect sense, but I don't believe it has to do with ap4k, but with the implementation of the operator itself. |
Correct. There is a |
This is the idea as the |
We need to package it at least as a separate maven module as it will be handled as a separate annotation such as |
Yes of course, I meant that the comment of the output doesn't have an affect on this task |
So in that case, could you please provide some examples of what you think the |
I have updated the ticket published on k8s sig-cli as this is really blocking for the moment to use separate CRDs as we can't (like in SQL) create a query able to group the results |
So, I propose to wait the result of my investigations before to work on that issue @geoand |
Yes, that makes sense :) |
Thanks for sharing! |
I believe I have understood the basic of ap4k development, so if/when we decide to move this forward, I'd be glad to start writing code |
Ideally |
That would be cool but I am guessing it could get pretty expensive on the server side |
@cmoulliard is this still relevant? |
This isn't relevant anymore as there is no Link CRD anymore in halkyon. |
Feature request
Move the @link annotation to a separate maven module. Why : As a link represents a relation which exists virtually between a component and an endpoint or service, then it should be used as standalone Annotation like the ServiceCatalog to describe such METADATA to be injected within the Component target (= DeploymentConfig)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: