Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow deployed containers to have different release versions #1725

Closed
yoomlam opened this issue Jun 22, 2023 · 3 comments
Closed

Allow deployed containers to have different release versions #1725

yoomlam opened this issue Jun 22, 2023 · 3 comments
Assignees

Comments

@yoomlam
Copy link
Contributor

yoomlam commented Jun 22, 2023

Currently, all the container images have the same image tag (or release version) regardless of whether the container itself has changed or not, which doesn't follow the concept of semantic versioning. This also means when we want to release new version of a container, other containers will be redeployed. This coupling of container images imposes an unnecessary constraint that reduces options in the future.

AC

  • We want a way to allow each container to have its own version, with no or minimal increases in manual maintenance or complexity overhead. We want to be able to deploy containers that have been updated. For example, The api-gateway container image doesn't change much. Another example: once domain-cc is stable, its version will remain unchanged, while we deploy new versions of a new domain-.... It doesn't make sense for domain-cc version number to change if it's features haven't changed.

Context

Involves understanding git tags, Gradle release plugin, image publishing to GHCR, inputs to SecRel, image tags in Helm charts, GitHub Action workflows, and our deployment process.

@yoomlam
Copy link
Contributor Author

yoomlam commented Jun 26, 2023

@yoomlam
Copy link
Contributor Author

yoomlam commented Jul 6, 2023

Yoom will be watching for errors during release creation and deploys.

@yoomlam
Copy link
Contributor Author

yoomlam commented Jul 10, 2023

Addressed some errors and made some improvements. It appears to be working.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants