Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

nominal BGS TS #2

Open
changhoonhahn opened this issue Oct 23, 2020 · 0 comments
Open

nominal BGS TS #2

changhoonhahn opened this issue Oct 23, 2020 · 0 comments
Assignees
Projects

Comments

@changhoonhahn
Copy link
Member

Omar pointed out a number of issues with the nominal BGS target selection based on the latest DR9 imaging.

  • There are significant differences between the nominal BGS cuts in the north and south. The cuts remove significantly more objects in the north than in the south.

    • Do we want different cuts for the north and the south?
  • The large galaxy mask and quality cuts remove a significant fraction of objects are in GAMA. For example, >70% of objects removed by FRACIN QC are GAMA objects. Meanwhile, they only contribute ~25/deg^2.

    • For SV do we want to relax the quality cuts for all target classes?
    • Do we want to relax the cuts for the nominal TS?

Based on Omar's update in 10/23/2020 BGS telecon

@changhoonhahn changhoonhahn self-assigned this Oct 23, 2020
@changhoonhahn changhoonhahn added this to To do in feasiBGS via automation Oct 23, 2020
@changhoonhahn changhoonhahn removed this from To do in feasiBGS Nov 4, 2020
@changhoonhahn changhoonhahn added this to To do in feasiBGS via automation Nov 4, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant