Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Estimate MPP hours for minitest notebook #5

Closed
weaverba137 opened this issue Nov 8, 2017 · 4 comments
Closed

Estimate MPP hours for minitest notebook #5

weaverba137 opened this issue Nov 8, 2017 · 4 comments
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@weaverba137
Copy link
Member

It's good to have an estimate of the amount of time to run the minitest notebook, but it would also be good to have an estimate of the number of MPP hours needed as well. It is possible that users with small allocations may burn though a significant fraction in just one run through.

@weaverba137
Copy link
Member Author

Based on a run through the notebook yesterday, I got about 540 "raw core hours". If that translates anything at all close to 1:1 to "MPP hours", then a single run of the notebook can burn through half a standard user's allocation.

@sbailey
Copy link
Contributor

sbailey commented Nov 8, 2017

On cori the conversion factor is 2.5 so running the notebook once would exceed the default 1000 core hours. That limit was purposefully small so that people would be purposeful in understanding the amount of time they are requesting, but we could make a larger default. The default for developers known to be working at NERSC is 10k. We could document this in the notebook as making sure that you have >1500 MPP hours available before starting.

Although this does sound like a lot for a test, note that this is only 10 tiles covered by 18 exposures, but that is 50000 targets = almost a week of e/BOSS running at full efficiency.

@weaverba137
Copy link
Member Author

For the record, I think the documentation added by #6 will be sufficient to close this issue.

@weaverba137
Copy link
Member Author

Fixed in #6.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants